在线咨询
中国工业与应用数学学会会刊
主管:中华人民共和国教育部
主办:西安交通大学
ISSN 1005-3085  CN 61-1269/O1

工程数学学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 43-58.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3085.2019.01.004

• • 上一篇    下一篇

忠诚奖励与统一定价的平台定价模型对比研究

朱   珠   

  1. 邮政科学研究规划院软科学中心,北京  100096
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-24 接受日期:2017-04-12 出版日期:2019-02-15 发布日期:2019-04-15

The Comparative Research on Platform Pricing Model Between Loyalty Rewards with Uniform Pricing

ZHU Zhu   

  1. Centre of Soft Science, China Post Science and Technology, Beijing 100096
  • Received:2016-11-24 Accepted:2017-04-12 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-04-15

摘要: 平台定价的价格策略对于参与平台竞争的管理决策者们有重要的辅助作用,忠诚奖励与统一定价是两种各有侧重的定价策略.本文通过提出假设构建平台定价的两阶段动态模型,对比分析不同价格策略对平台定价及利润的影响,进而得出若干命题.研究结果表明,平台第二阶段的定价及顾客留购率与忠诚顾客奖励产生的内生性转移成本正相关.而统一定价模型的均衡结果显示,两阶段利润总和变化取决于外生转移成本和用户预期折现系数的大小.

关键词: 平台竞争, 转移成本, 交叉网络外部性, 忠诚奖励

Abstract: The price strategy of platform pricing plays an important role in assisting managers who participate in platform competition. Amony different strategies, two important ones, loyalty rewarding and uniform pricing have their own emphasis. In this paper, a two-stage dynamic model for platform pricing is proposed, and the impact of price strategies on platform pricing and profit is comparably analyzed in the model, and then some propositions are obtained. The results show that the pricing of the platform at the second stage and the customer retention rate are positively correlated with the endogenous transfer costs generated by incentives to loyal customer. The equilibrium results of the unified pricing model show that the total profit changes of the two stages depend on the exogenous transfer cost and the expected discount coefficient of users.

Key words: platform competition, switching cost, cross network externality, loyalty rewards

中图分类号: